ตอบกระทู้
-
ผู้เขียนข้อความ
-
A piece that was confident enough to leave some questions open rather than forcing closure, and a look at blog33morning continued that intellectual honesty, content that admits the limits of its scope is more trustworthy than content that pretends to total understanding and this site has the right calibration on certainty consistently.
A piece that was confident enough to leave some questions open rather than forcing closure, and a look at blog33morning continued that intellectual honesty, content that admits the limits of its scope is more trustworthy than content that pretends to total understanding and this site has the right calibration on certainty consistently.
Now noticing that the post did not mention the writer at all, focus stayed on the topic, and a look at blog33morning continued that author absent quality, content that disappears the writer to focus on the substance is a particular kind of generosity and this site has clearly chosen the substance over the personality consistently.
If quality blog writing is dying as people sometimes claim then this site is one piece of evidence that it has not died yet, and a look at blog33morning extended that evidence, the broader cultural question about online writing has empirical answers in specific sites and this one is contributing to a more optimistic answer overall.
-
ผู้เขียนข้อความ

